“And it’s new. It’s a new thing. It seems to be having a bearing on a very sensitive political question. And so yeah, people will ask all sorts of questions, but for the moment, what we need to do is take a count of the, of the ruling, put it into practice.”
Mr Johnson suggested any reforms would be a “long way down the track” but did not rule out considering US-style selection processes for choosing justices..
The Prime Minister said he would both “respect the law” and leave the EU on October 31 – but refused to say how.
After being forced back to the Commons following the legal judgment on Tuesday, he said the court was wrong to wade into the row over the suspension of Parliament as he addressed MPs.
Mr Johnson told the chamber he had “followed the exact same process” as previous premiers when he called a Queen’s Speech but the judges intervened in the process for the first time.
Remainers launched a tirade of abuse at Mr Johnson for questioning the legal decision which overturned his advice to the Queen to suspend Parliament until October 14.
The premier insisted the Government “observes and will observe the law”.
But he said the judgment was “novel” and raised concerns over the court’s involvement at a time of intense political volatility.
He said: “Despite the fact that I followed the exact same process as my predecessors in calling a Queen’s Speech, the Supreme Court was asked to intervene in this process for the first time ever and it is absolutely no disrespect to the judiciary to say I think the Court was wrong to pronounce on what is essentially a political question at a time of great national controversy.”
Attorney General Geoffrey Cox earlier insisted it is acceptable to be “robustly critical” of the Supreme Court’s decision.
But he said any suggestion they had “improper” motives would be wrong.
He said: “There is nothing wrong at all in any member of the public, be it a Member of Parliament or otherwise, in criticising a court judgment. But what is wrong is that motives of an improper kind should be imputed to any judge in this country.
“We are defenders of the entire democratic constitution and we must be sure in everything we say.”
Credit: Source link