Evidence, not ideology, must guide preventive health care, say experts

A recent review of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care underscores the need for expert bodies to produce evidence-based guidance and that Canada should ensure a renewed task force is adequately funded and supported, argues a commentary in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Dr. Vivek Goel, President and Vice-Chancellor of the University of Waterloo and author of the commentary, chaired the External Expert Review panel that reviewed the task force’s structure, methodologies, and clinical practice guidelines, and looked at international best practices along with input from various groups.

“Our review affirmed that we need expert bodies like the task force, now more than ever, to produce evidence-based guidance for the public, health care practitioners, and health systems,” writes Dr. Goel.

There have been several versions of the task force that, over decades, helped to change the way medicine is practiced, moving from opinion-based medicine to evidence-based medicine.

“Those with stature, influence, and authority could drive care and policy in entire populations, with the potential to lead to substantial harm,” writes Dr. Goel.

“The task force pioneered the now-standard methods of evaluating clinical interventions not by tradition or authority but according to rigorous scientific evidence. The evidence-based medicine movement, whose development was led by clinicians at McMaster University, transformed preventive medicine globally and is among the most important achievements in health care worldwide.”

He calls for adequate funding and support to help the task force provide timely guidance on a national scale. The modernized task force should incorporate updated methodologies, take an inclusive, transparent approach in its work, and have protection from political interference.

“For decades, this important body has delivered high-impact work on a shoestring budget, relying on the time and expertise of many volunteers,” Dr. Goel writes.

With Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s directives affecting many similar guideline-producing bodies in the United States, this could be an opportune time for Canada.

“Canada has the opportunity to reclaim global leadership in preventive health. A modernized Canadian body that makes national preventive care recommendations will not just improve care—it will be a statement of Canadian values. As others retreat from science, Canada can lead with integrity, inclusiveness, and evidence, with a strong, independent body that is well resourced to produce high-quality guidance,” Dr. Goel concludes.

A recent review of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care underscores the need for expert bodies to produce evidence-based guidance and that Canada should ensure a renewed task force is adequately funded and supported, argues a commentary in the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Dr. Vivek Goel, President and Vice-Chancellor of the University of Waterloo and author of the commentary, chaired the External Expert Review panel that reviewed the task force’s structure, methodologies, and clinical practice guidelines, and looked at international best practices along with input from various groups.

“Our review affirmed that we need expert bodies like the task force, now more than ever, to produce evidence-based guidance for the public, health care practitioners, and health systems,” writes Dr. Goel.

There have been several versions of the task force that, over decades, helped to change the way medicine is practiced, moving from opinion-based medicine to evidence-based medicine.

“Those with stature, influence, and authority could drive care and policy in entire populations, with the potential to lead to substantial harm,” writes Dr. Goel.

“The task force pioneered the now-standard methods of evaluating clinical interventions not by tradition or authority but according to rigorous scientific evidence. The evidence-based medicine movement, whose development was led by clinicians at McMaster University, transformed preventive medicine globally and is among the most important achievements in health care worldwide.”

He calls for adequate funding and support to help the task force provide timely guidance on a national scale. The modernized task force should incorporate updated methodologies, take an inclusive, transparent approach in its work, and have protection from political interference.

“For decades, this important body has delivered high-impact work on a shoestring budget, relying on the time and expertise of many volunteers,” Dr. Goel writes.

With Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s directives affecting many similar guideline-producing bodies in the United States, this could be an opportune time for Canada.

“Canada has the opportunity to reclaim global leadership in preventive health. A modernized Canadian body that makes national preventive care recommendations will not just improve care—it will be a statement of Canadian values. As others retreat from science, Canada can lead with integrity, inclusiveness, and evidence, with a strong, independent body that is well resourced to produce high-quality guidance,” Dr. Goel concludes.