SpaceX Successfully Launches Starship Spacecraft After String of Mishaps todayheadline

SpaceX Successfully Launches Starship Spacecraft after String of Mishaps

By Dan Vergano edited by Clara Moskowitz

SpaceX successfully test launched its Starship rocket on Tuesday, overcoming past failures that had raised questions about the capabilities—and planetary aspirations—of the pioneering space launch firm.

“Splashdown confirmed! Congratulations to the entire SpaceX team on an exciting tenth flight test of Starship!,” the company announced on X (formerly twitter), following the successful conclusion of the controlled landing.

The 6:30 CDT liftoff from Texas carried a massive “Super Heavy” booster to the edge of space, some 119 miles high, where it dropped off from Starship’s upper stage spacecraft, somersaulted and fired two of its engines to soft land in the Gulf of Mexico. The upper stage continued into orbit, released eight test satellites and then braked to make its own splashdown in the Indian Ocean about an hour and 6 minutes after launch.

On supporting science journalism

If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Starship is the world’s tallest rocket, standing more than 400 feet, and the most powerful. It’s intended to carry 110 to 165 tons of cargo (although recent reports suggest that a range of 55 to 110 tons is more likely) into orbit and then return to Earth to be reused again. SpaceX chief Elon Musk has promised a successful Starship will cut the cost of shooting satellites into space significantly. Starship’s upper-stage spacecraft is also intended to land NASA astronauts on the moon for the Artemis III mission, which is scheduled for 2027 but will almost certainly be delayed. The vehicle is envisioned to touch down in upright fashion like one in a 1950s space flick.

Despite some minor structural damage to Starship on its re-entry, “overall a good flight putting the program back on track,” said astronomer Jonathan McDowell, on X. The trajectory of the spacecraft was designed to test its limits on re-entry, including removing heat tiles from the flight-damaged skirt, SpaceX commentators noted. The damage came about 47 minutes into the flight at an altitude of 55 miles.

This year two previous Starship test flights exploded over the Caribbean, and a third spun out of control over the Indian Ocean—mishaps that were all tied to explosions in rocket fuel systems. That has spurred concern that the rocket’s design fundamentally lacks the stability needed to dampen damaging vibrations from its multiple engines. Experts have speculated that adding stabilizing mass to Starship’s fuel system may be necessary, but such a move would cut into its cargo capacity.

The successful launch and planned water landings of both the Super Heavy booster and Starship’s upper-stage spacecraft reaffirms SpaceX’s policy of rapid testing spacecraft prototypes. According to SpaceX’s website, Starship’s reentry on this launch, for example, was “designed to intentionally stress the structural limits of the upper stage’s rear flaps,” which steer the spacecraft while it feels the maximum pressure on reentry from orbit, as well as the limits of various heat tile prototypes. The larger booster tested its ability to land using only two engines instead of the usual three. The company plans to begin testing a third version of the spacecraft next. This version is intended to travel into low-Earth orbit to refuel other rockets in space, a new technology that is needed for moon missions.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.