Similar postinsertion complication and technical survival rates are seen with single- and double-purse-string suture catheter insertion methods for peritoneal dialysis, according to a study published online Dec. 11 in Renal Failure.
Xiaoling Li, Ph.D., from the Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital in Chengdu, China, and colleagues conducted a retrospective study involving 142 patients who underwent peritoneal catheterization using the single- or double-purse-string suture method (Groups S and D, respectively).
The researchers found that within the first month postinsertion, there were no significant intergroup differences in terms of infection complication rates or noninfection complication rates. At one, two, and three years, the estimates of technical survival were 96.3, 90.4, and 85.9% and 89.9, 86.7, and 84.8% in Groups S and D, respectively. During the three-year follow-up, patient survival rates were comparable between the groups.
“In conclusion, this study revealed similarities in postinsertion complications and catheter technical survival rates between the single- and double-purse-string suture methods for peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation,” the authors write.
“These findings highlight the viability of the single-purse-string suture method, which simplifies the surgical process and is worthy of widespread clinical use.”
More information:
Xiaoling Li et al, Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string suture, Renal Failure (2024). DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2435209
© 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Citation:
Study compares single-, double-purse-string suture catheter insertion methods in dialysis (2024, December 21)
retrieved 21 December 2024
from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-12-purse-suture-catheter-insertion-methods.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
Similar postinsertion complication and technical survival rates are seen with single- and double-purse-string suture catheter insertion methods for peritoneal dialysis, according to a study published online Dec. 11 in Renal Failure.
Xiaoling Li, Ph.D., from the Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital in Chengdu, China, and colleagues conducted a retrospective study involving 142 patients who underwent peritoneal catheterization using the single- or double-purse-string suture method (Groups S and D, respectively).
The researchers found that within the first month postinsertion, there were no significant intergroup differences in terms of infection complication rates or noninfection complication rates. At one, two, and three years, the estimates of technical survival were 96.3, 90.4, and 85.9% and 89.9, 86.7, and 84.8% in Groups S and D, respectively. During the three-year follow-up, patient survival rates were comparable between the groups.
“In conclusion, this study revealed similarities in postinsertion complications and catheter technical survival rates between the single- and double-purse-string suture methods for peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation,” the authors write.
“These findings highlight the viability of the single-purse-string suture method, which simplifies the surgical process and is worthy of widespread clinical use.”
More information:
Xiaoling Li et al, Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string suture, Renal Failure (2024). DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2435209
© 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
Citation:
Study compares single-, double-purse-string suture catheter insertion methods in dialysis (2024, December 21)
retrieved 21 December 2024
from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-12-purse-suture-catheter-insertion-methods.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
