Putin stated that he and Trump had reached an “understanding” on Ukraine, urging European nations not to disrupt what he described as “nascent progress.” Following the meeting, Trump acknowledged that he had yet to speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy but indicated plans to do so alongside European leaders shortly.
The summit’s atmosphere was notably warm, with Trump and Putin sharing a ride in the U.S. presidential limousine, affectionately known as “The Beast.” This display of camaraderie raised eyebrows, particularly among Zelenskyy and European officials, who expressed concerns that Trump might prioritise U.S. interests over Ukrainian needs.
Zelenskyy’s absence from the discussions was particularly striking, as he released a video addressing the nation, urging for a strong U.S. stance in the conflict, stating, “Everyone wants an honest end to the war.”
Zelenskyy’s concerns are not unfounded. The summit offered Trump a platform to showcase his negotiation skills, boasting of his ability to end the conflict, a claim that has yet to materialise. For Putin, the meeting was an opportunity to solidify Russia’s position in Ukraine, undermine Kyiv’s aspirations for NATO membership, and reinforce Moscow’s influence over the region.
The meeting had an altered format compared to previous high-profile encounters, with a trio from each side participating. The decision to include Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff indicated a more cautious approach from the White House than during the controversial 2018 Helsinki summit, where Trump controversially sided with Putin over U.S. intelligence findings.As the summit progressed, the backdrop of “Alaska” and “Pursuing Peace” served as a reminder of the complex dynamics at play. While both leaders sought to project an image of cooperation, the reality is that significant gaps remain in the peace process.Putin’s insistence on linking any ceasefire to a halt in Western arms supplies contradicts Ukraine’s position, further complicating the path to resolution.Trump’s choice to host Putin on U.S. soil raises questions about the implications for international relations and the West’s strategy towards the conflict.
The exclusion of Zelenskyy from these critical discussions undermines the principle of “nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine,” leaving many to wonder what compromises might emerge from this high-stakes meeting.
