• Education
    • Higher Education
    • Scholarships & Grants
    • Online Learning
    • School Reforms
    • Research & Innovation
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
    • Food & Drink
    • Fashion & Beauty
    • Home & Living
    • Relationships & Family
  • Technology & Startups
    • Software & Apps
    • Startup Success Stories
    • Startups & Innovations
    • Tech Regulations
    • Venture Capital
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity
    • Emerging Technologies
    • Gadgets & Devices
    • Industry Analysis
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Advertise with Us
  • Privacy & Policy
Today Headline
  • Home
  • World News
    • Us & Canada
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • Middle East
  • Politics
    • Elections
    • Political Parties
    • Government Policies
    • International Relations
    • Legislative News
  • Business & Finance
    • Market Trends
    • Stock Market
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Corporate News
    • Economic Policies
  • Science & Environment
    • Space Exploration
    • Climate Change
    • Wildlife & Conservation
    • Environmental Policies
    • Medical Research
  • Health
    • Public Health
    • Mental Health
    • Medical Breakthroughs
    • Fitness & Nutrition
    • Pandemic Updates
  • Sports
    • Football
    • Basketball
    • Tennis
    • Olympics
    • Motorsport
  • Entertainment
    • Movies
    • Music
    • TV & Streaming
    • Celebrity News
    • Awards & Festivals
  • Crime & Justice
    • Court Cases
    • Cybercrime
    • Policing
    • Criminal Investigations
    • Legal Reforms
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • World News
    • Us & Canada
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • Middle East
  • Politics
    • Elections
    • Political Parties
    • Government Policies
    • International Relations
    • Legislative News
  • Business & Finance
    • Market Trends
    • Stock Market
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Corporate News
    • Economic Policies
  • Science & Environment
    • Space Exploration
    • Climate Change
    • Wildlife & Conservation
    • Environmental Policies
    • Medical Research
  • Health
    • Public Health
    • Mental Health
    • Medical Breakthroughs
    • Fitness & Nutrition
    • Pandemic Updates
  • Sports
    • Football
    • Basketball
    • Tennis
    • Olympics
    • Motorsport
  • Entertainment
    • Movies
    • Music
    • TV & Streaming
    • Celebrity News
    • Awards & Festivals
  • Crime & Justice
    • Court Cases
    • Cybercrime
    • Policing
    • Criminal Investigations
    • Legal Reforms
No Result
View All Result
Today Headline
No Result
View All Result
Home Science & Environment Medical Research

When doctors skip the numbers, patients may misjudge the health risks

May 22, 2025
in Medical Research
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
0
patient talk
3
SHARES
6
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


patient talk
Credit: Pavel Danilyuk from Pexels

When a physician says a procedure is “rarely risky,” what does that really mean? Although terms like “common” and “unlikely” may sound descriptive enough, experts in medical decision-making suggest that leaving out numbers may be misleading for patients.

In a paper published on April 29 in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, a team of researchers and clinicians explained that patients often overestimate risk estimates, like possible side effects or medical conditions, when given only verbal descriptions. They encourage doctors not to shy away from including numbers, offering a list of five science-backed tricks on how to make those numbers count.

“One of the purposes of this paper is to help physicians figure out how to communicate numeric information about risks so that patients can understand and use them to make better choices, take charge of their health and be healthier long term,” said Ellen Peters, a professor at the University of Oregon School of Journalism and Communication and Department of Psychology.

Peters, also director of the Center for Science Communication Research at the UO, draws on two decades of research on how patients understand numbers and make decisions. She said it’s a common concern that patients won’t understand numerical information, as about a third of American adults have limited numerical skills.

But she’s found that people often prefer getting numbers. According to her previous studies, people rated messages more trustworthy and their messenger more expert when they provided data.

In collaboration with physicians Paul K.J. Han of the National Cancer Institute and Clara N. Lee at the University of North Carolina, Peters hopes their recommended strategies will facilitate stronger shared decision-making between patients and their health care providers.

“There’s a whole raft of strategies that you can use, some of which might be more appropriate in one situation versus the other,” she said. “But by choosing one of them, you can help people use statistics more than they typically would. Otherwise, numbers are just abstract and meaningless.”

Communicate with numbers, not just words

Physicians often default to verbal terms, knowing that a sizable portion of American adults struggle with simple numeric concepts, Peters said. But research has shown that people better understand risks and react appropriately when numbers are discussed alongside verbal descriptions.

“When you present numeric evidence, like the likelihood of side effects for a prescription medication, what ends up happening is that it helps correct people’s original expectation,” Peters said. “They’re much less likely to overestimate the risk and are more likely to take on a physician’s recommendations.”

Do: “Headache is a common side effect and occurs in 7% of people.”

Don’t: “Headache is a common side effect.”

Make numbers more manageable

When patients are overwhelmed by medical information, they may rely on mental problem-solving techniques, like gut feelings, pre-existing beliefs and anecdotes they’ve heard from others. To avoid cognitive overload, Peters suggests limiting information to what’s important. If a disease has three intervention options but a patient has a condition that eliminates one as a viable option, she advises not to mention that option.

The authors also suggest clinicians do the math for their patients. For example, they can calculate the risk of birth control based on the number of years the patient expects to use it instead of the annual risk.

Do: Highlight only the key facts and tailor information to the patient’s situation.

Don’t: Provide information that isn’t relevant to a specific patient.

Provide context to statistics

Numbers said alone can be meaningless, so Peters suggests using evaluative labels, like “a 6% risk is generally considered poor,” or comparisons to indicate whether it’s high or low risk.

Do: “Ninety-three percent of patients survive with treatment A compared to 99% who survive with treatment B.”

Don’t: “Ninety-three percent of patients survive with treatment A.”

Acknowledge uncertainty

Risk information is an estimate. In some cases, being upfront about the uncertainty of whether a patient will be a part of the 40% side or the 60% side of a risk, for example, can help convey to patients how seriously they should take it.

Do: “Estimates of the chance of something happening are only a best guess based on the scientific knowledge we have right now. We do not know your personal real risk because of things about you that have never been studied and we don’t yet understand.”

Don’t: Present numeric risk information as unerringly precise and correct.

Test your communication through the teach-back technique

Experts tend to overestimate how much other people know and how clearly they’ve communicated. So doctors can use the teach-back technique, Peters said, in which they ask their patient to repeat what they understood and found important. The physician can then insert more information to either correct what’s wrong or remind them of something.

Do: “This can be hard to understand. I’d like to make sure I’ve explained it clearly. Could you tell me how you understand the pros and cons of taking drug X?”

Don’t: “What questions do you have?”

Such strategies can also be used by patients to advocate for themselves, Peters said. If told about a possible side effect, they can ask how statistically likely it is. If given too many possible side effects or treatments, they can request to simplify the information to the most important facts.

Peters plans to conduct a series of studies to test which of the five strategies is the most effective. She is also interested in how storytelling and anecdotes affect patient decision-making.

“Physicians have very limited time in any one appointment and are often faced with a similar patient over and over,” Peters said. “What that means is, if you’re trying to help them better communicate with patients, you’ve got to provide things that are fast and scripted so that everyone can make informed decisions about their care.”

More information:
Ellen Peters et al, Communicating Numeric Risk Information to Patients, Journal of General Internal Medicine (2025). DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09520-8

Provided by
University of Oregon


Citation:
When doctors skip the numbers, patients may misjudge the health risks (2025, May 22)
retrieved 22 May 2025
from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-05-doctors-patients-misjudge-health.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.



patient talk
Credit: Pavel Danilyuk from Pexels

When a physician says a procedure is “rarely risky,” what does that really mean? Although terms like “common” and “unlikely” may sound descriptive enough, experts in medical decision-making suggest that leaving out numbers may be misleading for patients.

In a paper published on April 29 in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, a team of researchers and clinicians explained that patients often overestimate risk estimates, like possible side effects or medical conditions, when given only verbal descriptions. They encourage doctors not to shy away from including numbers, offering a list of five science-backed tricks on how to make those numbers count.

“One of the purposes of this paper is to help physicians figure out how to communicate numeric information about risks so that patients can understand and use them to make better choices, take charge of their health and be healthier long term,” said Ellen Peters, a professor at the University of Oregon School of Journalism and Communication and Department of Psychology.

Peters, also director of the Center for Science Communication Research at the UO, draws on two decades of research on how patients understand numbers and make decisions. She said it’s a common concern that patients won’t understand numerical information, as about a third of American adults have limited numerical skills.

But she’s found that people often prefer getting numbers. According to her previous studies, people rated messages more trustworthy and their messenger more expert when they provided data.

In collaboration with physicians Paul K.J. Han of the National Cancer Institute and Clara N. Lee at the University of North Carolina, Peters hopes their recommended strategies will facilitate stronger shared decision-making between patients and their health care providers.

“There’s a whole raft of strategies that you can use, some of which might be more appropriate in one situation versus the other,” she said. “But by choosing one of them, you can help people use statistics more than they typically would. Otherwise, numbers are just abstract and meaningless.”

Communicate with numbers, not just words

Physicians often default to verbal terms, knowing that a sizable portion of American adults struggle with simple numeric concepts, Peters said. But research has shown that people better understand risks and react appropriately when numbers are discussed alongside verbal descriptions.

“When you present numeric evidence, like the likelihood of side effects for a prescription medication, what ends up happening is that it helps correct people’s original expectation,” Peters said. “They’re much less likely to overestimate the risk and are more likely to take on a physician’s recommendations.”

Do: “Headache is a common side effect and occurs in 7% of people.”

Don’t: “Headache is a common side effect.”

Make numbers more manageable

When patients are overwhelmed by medical information, they may rely on mental problem-solving techniques, like gut feelings, pre-existing beliefs and anecdotes they’ve heard from others. To avoid cognitive overload, Peters suggests limiting information to what’s important. If a disease has three intervention options but a patient has a condition that eliminates one as a viable option, she advises not to mention that option.

The authors also suggest clinicians do the math for their patients. For example, they can calculate the risk of birth control based on the number of years the patient expects to use it instead of the annual risk.

Do: Highlight only the key facts and tailor information to the patient’s situation.

Don’t: Provide information that isn’t relevant to a specific patient.

Provide context to statistics

Numbers said alone can be meaningless, so Peters suggests using evaluative labels, like “a 6% risk is generally considered poor,” or comparisons to indicate whether it’s high or low risk.

Do: “Ninety-three percent of patients survive with treatment A compared to 99% who survive with treatment B.”

Don’t: “Ninety-three percent of patients survive with treatment A.”

Acknowledge uncertainty

Risk information is an estimate. In some cases, being upfront about the uncertainty of whether a patient will be a part of the 40% side or the 60% side of a risk, for example, can help convey to patients how seriously they should take it.

Do: “Estimates of the chance of something happening are only a best guess based on the scientific knowledge we have right now. We do not know your personal real risk because of things about you that have never been studied and we don’t yet understand.”

Don’t: Present numeric risk information as unerringly precise and correct.

Test your communication through the teach-back technique

Experts tend to overestimate how much other people know and how clearly they’ve communicated. So doctors can use the teach-back technique, Peters said, in which they ask their patient to repeat what they understood and found important. The physician can then insert more information to either correct what’s wrong or remind them of something.

Do: “This can be hard to understand. I’d like to make sure I’ve explained it clearly. Could you tell me how you understand the pros and cons of taking drug X?”

Don’t: “What questions do you have?”

Such strategies can also be used by patients to advocate for themselves, Peters said. If told about a possible side effect, they can ask how statistically likely it is. If given too many possible side effects or treatments, they can request to simplify the information to the most important facts.

Peters plans to conduct a series of studies to test which of the five strategies is the most effective. She is also interested in how storytelling and anecdotes affect patient decision-making.

“Physicians have very limited time in any one appointment and are often faced with a similar patient over and over,” Peters said. “What that means is, if you’re trying to help them better communicate with patients, you’ve got to provide things that are fast and scripted so that everyone can make informed decisions about their care.”

More information:
Ellen Peters et al, Communicating Numeric Risk Information to Patients, Journal of General Internal Medicine (2025). DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09520-8

Provided by
University of Oregon


Citation:
When doctors skip the numbers, patients may misjudge the health risks (2025, May 22)
retrieved 22 May 2025
from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-05-doctors-patients-misjudge-health.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.


Tags: Health ResearchHealth Research NewsHealth ScienceMedicine ResearchMedicine Research NewsMedicine Science
Previous Post

Fired workers accused LAHSA head of cronyism and improper behavior

Next Post

Humpback whales may not see their most dangerous threats

Related Posts

FEATURE: Technologies that changed healthcare and saved lives, part two

FEATURE: Technologies that changed healthcare and saved lives, part two

May 22, 2025
5
mammogram

Additional imaging techniques can detect early stage cancers missed by mammograms in women with dense breasts

May 22, 2025
4
Next Post
Humpback whales may not see their most dangerous threats

Humpback whales may not see their most dangerous threats

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Family calls for change after B.C. nurse dies by suicide after attacks on the job

Family calls for change after B.C. nurse dies by suicide after attacks on the job

April 2, 2025
Pioneering 3D printing project shares successes

Product reduces TPH levels to non-hazardous status

November 27, 2024

Hospital Mergers Fail to Deliver Better Care or Lower Costs, Study Finds todayheadline

December 31, 2024

Police ID man who died after Corso Italia fight

December 23, 2024
Harris tells supporters 'never give up' and urges peaceful transfer of power

Harris tells supporters ‘never give up’ and urges peaceful transfer of power

0
Des Moines Man Accused Of Shooting Ex-Girlfriend's Mother

Des Moines Man Accused Of Shooting Ex-Girlfriend’s Mother

0

Trump ‘looks forward’ to White House meeting with Biden

0
Catholic voters were critical to Donald Trump’s blowout victory: ‘Harris snubbed us’

Catholic voters were critical to Donald Trump’s blowout victory: ‘Harris snubbed us’

0
Murdered live on TikTok – Mexico’s femicide crisis

Murdered live on TikTok – Mexico’s femicide crisis

May 22, 2025

Billion dollar pizza? Bitcoin soars on key anniversary of crypto’s growth

May 22, 2025
Rainfall warning in place for Toronto, Durham as up to 60 mm possible

Rainfall warning in place for Toronto, Durham as up to 60 mm possible

May 22, 2025

GFJTU, ILO launch new media plan to defend worker rights

May 22, 2025

Recent News

Murdered live on TikTok – Mexico’s femicide crisis

Murdered live on TikTok – Mexico’s femicide crisis

May 22, 2025
0

Billion dollar pizza? Bitcoin soars on key anniversary of crypto’s growth

May 22, 2025
5
Rainfall warning in place for Toronto, Durham as up to 60 mm possible

Rainfall warning in place for Toronto, Durham as up to 60 mm possible

May 22, 2025
2

GFJTU, ILO launch new media plan to defend worker rights

May 22, 2025
4

TodayHeadline is a dynamic news website dedicated to delivering up-to-date and comprehensive news coverage from around the globe.

Follow Us

Browse by Category

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Basketball
  • Business & Finance
  • Climate Change
  • Crime & Justice
  • Economic Policies
  • Elections
  • Entertainment
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Environmental Policies
  • Europe
  • Football
  • Gadgets & Devices
  • Health
  • Medical Research
  • Mental Health
  • Middle East
  • Motorsport
  • Olympics
  • Politics
  • Public Health
  • Relationships & Family
  • Science & Environment
  • Software & Apps
  • Space Exploration
  • Sports
  • Stock Market
  • Technology & Startups
  • Tennis
  • Travel
  • Uncategorized
  • Us & Canada
  • Wildlife & Conservation
  • World News

Recent News

Billion dollar pizza? Bitcoin soars on key anniversary of crypto’s growth

May 22, 2025
Rainfall warning in place for Toronto, Durham as up to 60 mm possible

Rainfall warning in place for Toronto, Durham as up to 60 mm possible

May 22, 2025
  • Education
  • Lifestyle
  • Technology & Startups
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Advertise with Us
  • Privacy & Policy

© 2024 Todayheadline.co

Welcome Back!

OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Business & Finance
  • Corporate News
  • Economic Policies
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Market Trends
  • Crime & Justice
  • Court Cases
  • Criminal Investigations
  • Cybercrime
  • Legal Reforms
  • Policing
  • Education
  • Higher Education
  • Online Learning
  • Entertainment
  • Awards & Festivals
  • Celebrity News
  • Movies
  • Music
  • Health
  • Fitness & Nutrition
  • Medical Breakthroughs
  • Mental Health
  • Pandemic Updates
  • Lifestyle
  • Fashion & Beauty
  • Food & Drink
  • Home & Living
  • Politics
  • Elections
  • Government Policies
  • International Relations
  • Legislative News
  • Political Parties
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cybersecurity
  • Emerging Technologies
  • Gadgets & Devices
  • Industry Analysis
  • Basketball
  • Football
  • Motorsport
  • Olympics
  • Climate Change
  • Environmental Policies
  • Medical Research
  • Science & Environment
  • Space Exploration
  • Wildlife & Conservation
  • Sports
  • Tennis
  • Technology & Startups
  • Software & Apps
  • Startup Success Stories
  • Startups & Innovations
  • Tech Regulations
  • Venture Capital
  • Uncategorized
  • World News
  • Us & Canada
  • Public Health
  • Relationships & Family
  • Travel
  • Research & Innovation
  • Scholarships & Grants
  • School Reforms
  • Stock Market
  • TV & Streaming
  • Advertise with Us
  • Privacy & Policy
  • About us
  • Contact

© 2024 Todayheadline.co