Justice Sanjeev Narula made the observation while dismissing an application filed by the woman’s mother-in-law and late father-in-law. In an order passed on October 16, the judge held that the daughter-in-law cannot be dispossessed except through due legal process.
Advocate Samvedna Verma represented the daughter-in-law, while the parents-in-law were represented by advocate Kajal Chandra.
According to the petition, the dispute, spanning over a decade, arose after the daughter-in-law’s marriage to the petitioner’s son in 2010 and her subsequent residence with her in-laws at the property.
The matrimonial relationship soured in 2011, leading to multiple civil and criminal proceedings between the parties.
The petitioners contended that the property was the self-acquired estate of the late Daljit Singh and, therefore, could not be deemed a shared household under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.The court, however, maintained that the existing arrangement — where the mother-in-law resides on the first floor and the daughter-in-law on the ground floor — adequately balances both parties’ interests.













