Turkey has just fired a bold new shot in the Middle East arms race with a hypersonic missile that could redraw the balance of power across the region.
This month, Newsweek reported Turkey’s public unveiling of its first hypersonic-capable missile, the Tayfun Block-4, at the ongoing International Defense Industry Fair (IDEF) in Istanbul.
Developed by state-owned defense firm Roketsan, the Tayfun Block-4 marks a significant step in Turkey’s pursuit of indigenous strategic systems amid regional volatility and its broader defense modernization push.
Operating at hypersonic cruise speeds, the land-based ballistic missile boasts a range exceeding 280 kilometers and carries a pre-shaped fragmentation warhead guided by an in-space navigation system. It is engineered to target high-value assets such as integrated air defenses, hardened infrastructure, and command-and-control nodes.
Roketsan confirms the weapon’s weight exceeds seven tons and states it is not earmarked for export. The launch forms part of Turkey’s wider military expansion—encompassing a fifth-generation fighter and a domestically built aircraft carrier—amid renewed efforts to re-engage with the US F-35 program following its 2019 suspension tied to the acquisition of Russia’s S-400 missile defense system.
Turkey may leverage the Tayfun to project power and deter regional rivals, but its pursuit of strategic autonomy risks fueling instability and straining NATO cohesion.
Ozgur Eksi and Kaan Azman argue in a June 2025 TurDef article that Iran’s recent strikes on Israel show that Tehran retains the capability to hit back despite heavy US sanctions, and that hypersonic missiles may pose a vulnerability to Israel’s layered air defense.
They add that in response, Turkey is building its own layered “Steel Dome” missile and air defense network, while simultaneously developing hypersonic, ballistic and cruise missile capabilities for deterrence.
To fast-track development, Eksi and Azman note that Turkey may modify the existing Tayfun short-range ballistic missile (SRBM) into a hypersonic platform, significantly reducing production time. The Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) further notes that Turkey plans to extend the Tayfun’s range to 1,000 kilometers, marking an evolutionary path from tactical to theater-range systems.
The Tayfun may also tie into Turkey’s broader strategy for Middle East power projection. John Sheldon writes in a December 2024 report for the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) that regional states are increasingly adopting long-range ballistic and cruise missiles as cost-effective alternatives to traditional airpower, allowing for precision strikes without risking pilots or expensive platforms.
He notes that these systems offer both state and non-state actors the means to influence adversary behavior through deterrence and coercion and provide operational flexibility in both conventional and hybrid conflicts.
Jeffrey Lewis underscores this point in an October 2021 NTI article, noting that 11 countries in the region—among them Bahrain, Iran, Egypt, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Yemen, the UAE, and Turkey—possess long-range missiles at or above the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Category I threshold.
He adds that six of these nations have or are developing indigenous manufacturing capabilities, signaling a broader shift toward domestic arms production and strategic autonomy.
This evolving arsenal plays directly into Turkey’s regional strategy. Emadeddin Badi and Abdullah al-Jabassini argue in a January 2025 Atlantic Council article that Turkey’s simultaneous military interventions in Syria and Libya reveal an assertive Mediterranean strategy aimed at reshaping regional balances through force projection, maritime maneuvering and diplomatic leverage.
They observe that this dual-theater engagement highlights a vision of an interconnected Mediterranean sphere but warn that it exposes Turkey to overextension and backlash.
Notably, they add that Israel views Turkey’s growing footprint in Syria as a direct threat, prompting intensified airstrikes to curb Turkish influence. They write that while Turkey’s strategy—blending military power with diplomacy and economic tools—has yielded short-term gains, it rests on fragile foundations.
They further note that regional volatility and pushback from powers like Russia and Israel continue to test the limits of Turkish ambitions.
Such developments carry broader regional implications. Jean-Loup Samaan warns in a June 2022 Trends Advisory Research article that the proliferation of hypersonic weapons heightens the risk of instability for states like Turkey.
He notes that even with high-end systems like Patriot and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), the Middle East remains vulnerable to missile saturation, and hypersonics could further widen these gaps.
For Turkey, a NATO member with growing regional entanglements, Samaan argues that the introduction of such weapons could deepen strategic asymmetries, particularly vis-a-vis Iran and Russia.
He cautions that Iranian acquisition of hypersonic capabilities—primarily through collaboration with Russia or China—could upend deterrence dynamics across the Eastern Mediterranean.
While Samaan writes that hypersonics may not fundamentally revolutionize warfare, they complicate threat assessments and strategic planning, especially for middle powers.
He concludes that these weapons force states like Turkey to innovate faster, recalibrate command hierarchies and rethink defense postures in an already fragmented regional security landscape.
The Tayfun’s development could also impact Turkey’s relations with NATO, especially amid tensions with fellow member Greece. In December 2022, the Associated Press (AP) reported that the Greek government accused Turkey of “North Korea-like behavior” after President Recep Tayyip Erdogan threatened to strike Athens with ballistic missiles.
AP noted that the two countries, long locked in disputes over maritime boundaries and energy rights in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean, have nearly gone to war three times in the past 50 years.
Expanding on this, Marianna Serveta notes in a September 2024 Swedish Defence Research Agency article that while the Tayfun is symbolically tied to Turkey’s push for strategic autonomy, it is fundamentally a tactical system shaped by local defense priorities.
She argues that its development reflects Turkey’s push for operational independence amid arms embargoes and NATO mistrust, geared more toward boosting maneuverability than redefining alliance-level deterrence.
Turkey’s hypersonic push may elevate its regional clout, but it also deepens the fault lines in an already volatile landscape. As the Tayfun nears operational deployment, the challenge will be calibrating its deterrent value without tipping the region into further escalation.
