Pressure from private interest groups
CJI Chandrachud highlighted the influence of private interest groups, which use media platforms to shape public perception and create pressure on judicial decisions. “The price of independence here… is to be subjected to heavy trolling. ‘You will be trolled, you will be attacked,â€â€ he remarked, pointing out the toll such tactics take on judges who aim to deliver impartial verdicts.
Judicial independence
Addressing the issue of judicial independence, CJI Chandrachud observed that it is often misinterpreted. “It’s wrong to measure independence only by looking at judgments where the Supreme Court went against government views. It’s a reflection of the state of our polity today,” he explained. He noted that polarised perspectives have led groups on opposite sides to assess the Supreme Courtâ€s autonomy based on its alignment with their views. “I think I have tried to draw a balance,” he stated, adding that he bases judgments on judicial reasoning rather than aligning with preconceived ideas.
Working with the government
The CJI also emphasised the importance of cooperation between the judiciary and government, particularly on administrative matters. Reflecting on his efforts to enhance judicial infrastructure, he mentioned that government-provided funds are essential for these improvements. “Consultation with govts is also key to resolving court-executive differences,†he explained, referencing ongoing issues, like the Supreme Court collegiumâ€s differences with the Centre over judicial appointments.
In addressing these differences, CJI Chandrachud was forthright about his interactions with the government. “I have always been candid with the government,” he said, recalling instances when the government resisted a collegium decision. “But all differences can’t be resolved,” he admitted. He highlighted the case of Saurabh Kirpal, a lawyer proposed for a High Court judgeship, whose appointment remains pending due to his sexuality and his partnerâ€s foreign nationality. “My view is that neither a prospective judge’s sexuality nor the fact that his partner is a foreign citizen can be held against him when assessing his fitness for the job,” CJI Chandrachud stated.
A call for modernising legal language and court practices
A respected figure for his clear judgement writing, CJI Chandrachud criticised the use of outdated language in legal rulings, which he believes hinders accessibility to justice. Advocating for modernization, he also expressed support for simpler, climate-appropriate attire for lawyers and practical courthouse designs, aligning with his vision to make the judiciary more approachable and functional.Inputs from TOI
